What is the difference between being fully insured and self funded?

Created by Kelly Knudsen, Modified on Fri, 19 Jan at 9:47 PM by Kelly Knudsen

The difference between being fully insured and self-funded pertains to how an employer provides and manages their employee health benefits:


Fully Insured: When an employer chooses a fully insured health plan, they contract with an insurance company or health insurer to provide health coverage to their employees. The employer pays premiums to the insurance company, and in return, the insurance company assumes the financial risk for the cost of healthcare services provided to the employees. The insurance company handles claims processing, pays medical expenses, and manages the administration of the plan. The employer's responsibility is primarily limited to paying premiums and possibly selecting from a range of plan options offered by the insurer. The insurance company assumes the risk associated with healthcare costs, and the employer receives predictable premium costs.


Self-Funded (or Self-Insured): In a self-funded health plan, the employer assumes the financial risk for providing healthcare benefits to their employees. Instead of paying premiums to an insurance company, the employer sets up and manages the health plan themselves, typically with the help of a third-party administrator (TPA). The employer directly funds the healthcare claims and expenses incurred by employees. They may also purchase stop-loss insurance to protect against catastrophic or high-cost claims. With a self-funded plan, the employer has more control over plan design, cost management, and access to claims data for analyzing and managing healthcare utilization. The employer assumes the financial risk for the plan, but also has the potential to benefit from cost savings if healthcare expenses are lower than anticipated.


Key differences between fully insured and self-funded arrangements include:


  • Financial Risk: In a fully insured plan, the insurance company assumes the financial risk for healthcare costs, while in a self-funded plan, the employer takes on the financial risk.
  • Premiums vs. Claims: In a fully insured plan, the employer pays fixed premiums to the insurance company, whereas in a self-funded plan, the employer pays for actual healthcare claims and expenses incurred by employees.
  • Plan Design Flexibility: Self-funded plans provide more flexibility in customizing the plan design, including the choice of healthcare providers, coverage options, and cost-sharing arrangements. Fully insured plans often have standardized plan designs offered by the insurance company.
  • Cost Control and Transparency: With a self-funded plan, the employer has greater visibility into healthcare costs, claims data, and utilization patterns. This enables them to implement cost-saving measures, negotiate directly with healthcare providers, and design wellness programs to manage healthcare expenses. Fully insured plans may have less transparency and limited opportunities for cost control by the employer.


It's important to note that the decision to choose between fully insured and self-funded health plans depends on factors such as the size of the organization, financial stability, risk tolerance, administrative capabilities, and regulatory considerations. Employers should carefully evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, and associated costs of each approach before making a decision. Consulting with benefits advisors, insurance professionals, and legal experts can help employers navigate the complexities and make an informed choice.


For support in managing your fiduciary responsibilities, visit Fiduciary In A Box.


© 2023 Fiduciary In A Box, Inc. All rights reserved.


Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article