How Can Altering Company Contribution Types Improve Participant Outcomes?

Employers looking to enhance the financial well-being of their employees should consider the impact of altering contribution types within their retirement plans. The choice of how and when to contribute can dramatically influence participant behavior and ultimately improve their financial security in retirement.

One of the most effective ways to boost participant outcomes is by implementing or increasing matching contributions. With a matching contribution, the employer matches a portion of the employee’s own contributions to the retirement plan. This not only incentivizes employees to save more—since they effectively receive "free money" when they contribute—but also ensures that they are actively engaged in planning for their retirement. Research has shown that employees are more likely to contribute to their retirement plans when they know that their employer will match their contributions, leading to higher overall savings rates and better retirement readiness [1].

Another impactful strategy is automatic enrollment, which can be combined with employer contributions. Automatic enrollment involves enrolling employees into the retirement plan by default, with an option to opt-out. This approach is highly effective in increasing participation rates, particularly among younger employees or those who might otherwise delay saving. When paired with employer contributions, such as a non-elective contribution where the employer contributes regardless of employee participation, it ensures that all employees are building a retirement nest egg, even if they are not proactively contributing themselves. Studies have indicated that automatic enrollment can dramatically increase plan participation rates, often to over 90%, significantly improving retirement savings outcomes for a broader range of employees [2].

Altering contribution types can also allow employers to provide targeted benefits that address the specific needs of different employee groups. For instance, a company might choose to offer higher contributions to lower-income employees who may struggle more to save. This could help reduce income inequality in retirement outcomes, ensuring that all employees, regardless of income level, have a secure retirement. Moreover, such strategies can be part of a broader initiative to demonstrate the company’s commitment to employee well-being, potentially increasing job satisfaction and retention [3].

The flexibility in altering contribution types allows employers to tailor their retirement plans to align with both the company’s financial goals and the needs of their employees. By thoughtfully designing contribution strategies, employers can foster a culture of saving, increase participation rates, and ultimately enhance the retirement security of their workforce. As retirement readiness becomes increasingly critical in today’s economic landscape, these adjustments are not just beneficial—they are essential for helping employees achieve financial security in their later years.

References:

 [1] Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2009). The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Saving Outcomes: Evidence from the United States. In Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment (pp. 167-195). University of Chicago Press.

 [2] Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2013). Behavioral Economics and the Retirement Savings Crisis. Science, 339(6124), 1152-1153.

 [3] Munnell, A. H., Webb, A., & Golub-Sass, F. (2012). The National Retirement Risk Index: An Update. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

For support in managing your fiduciary responsibilities, visit www.fiduciaryinabox.com.

© 2024 Fiduciary In A Box, Inc. All rights reserved.